UITF CLASSIFICATION
UITF CLASSIFICATION – Easing the Challenge of Selection
As financial markets evolve, investment choices multiply. In the
The UITF Council’s basic concept was to categorize the UITFs according to the assets they are invested in. By doing so, the Council is enabling potential investors to differentiate the Funds by the respective risk-return characteristics of their underlying assets. UITFs invested principally in equity securities or stocks are called Equity Funds. UITFs invested in a mix of equity and fixed-income securities are called Balanced Funds. UITFs invested in fixed-income securities have four (4) variants distinguished by a parameter called the Macaulay Duration: Money Market Funds, Intermediate-, Medium-, and Long-Term Bond Funds. Funds that are benchmarked against specific indices are called Index Funds.
Equity Funds
The objective of Equity Funds is to maximize returns by investing in equities or stock investments that bear the potential of delivering higher returns from capital appreciation, as well as dividend earnings. However, this potential for earnings carries with it the potential for losses, not only of income, but of principal. Clients investing in this type of fund should be aware of this. They should be risk takers and should be willing to take the risk or volatility associated with investing in equities. A long investment time horizon is recommended when investing in equity funds.
Balanced Funds
The objective of Balanced Funds is to provide its investors with capital appreciation over the medium-term through a portfolio mix of equities and fixed-income securities. For uniformity of standards, the
Fixed-Income Funds
The UITF Council of
In simple terms, Macaulay duration reflects a security’s or a portfolio’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates. For example, a bond with a Macaulay duration of three (3) years will roughly behave similarly to a bond with a maturity of three (3) years in terms of sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Since Macaulay duration is a measure of the average time to receipt of cash flows, it follows that bonds that have long maturities have high Macaulay durations, which in turn translates to higher interest rate sensitivity. By simple deduction then, longer-term bonds are more sensitive to interest rate changes than shorter-term bonds. Therefore, a class of funds with a high Macaulay duration will be highly sensitive to interest rate changes and will exhibit high volatility. Corollarily, a class of funds with a low Macaulay duration will be less sensitive to interest rate changes and will exhibit low volatility.
Using Macaulay Duration, the
| Type of UITF | Portfolio Macaulay Duration |
| Money Market Funds | Up to a maximum of one (1) year |
| Intermediate-term Bond Funds | Up to a maximum of three (3) years |
| Medium-term Bond Funds | Up to a maximum of five (5) years |
| Long-term Bond Funds | About five (5) years |
MONEY MARKET FUNDS
The objectives of Money Market Funds are capital preservation and income generation from low risk investments. These funds are invested principally in fixed–income securities and have a portfolio duration of less than a year, These are suitable for risk averse investors who are looking for safe and liquid investments with yields that are relatively modest due to lower risk exposures. The returns on these funds, however, are usually higher than the returns on savings accounts or time deposits.
BOND FUNDS: INTERMEDIATE-, MEDIUM- and LONG-TERM BOND FUNDS
The objectives of Bond Funds are capital appreciation and higher yields over the intermediate, medium or long-term, as the case may be. These funds are invested in higher yielding bonds and are suitable for risk tolerant investors who have a longer investment time horizon and who are willing to take on the risk of a more volatile portfolio in exchange for higher yields due to the longer term nature of the fund’s investments.
By now, the practical importance of classifying fixed-income UITFs is evident. Notice in the above table that as we move from Money Market Funds to Long-term Bond Funds, the portfolio Macaulay duration, and therefore, interest rate sensitivity and portfolio volatility, increase. Thus, a client with a low tolerance for volatility, and therefore risk, should invest in a fund that has a low duration. Corollarily, a client who has a high tolerance for volatility, and therefore risk, should invest in a fund that has a high duration.
There is, however, a caveat to this classification. Although a number of UITFs may belong to the same UITF classification, it does not follow that all these funds will deliver the same returns over a given period. Fund management is a complex undertaking and there are a multitude of other factors that affect a fund’s performance other than duration, such as amount of management fee, other charges, etc. The investor is therefore advised to be cognizant of this fact. He is also advised to scrutinize, among other things, the quality of and the proportionate exposure to the securities that make up a specific UITF. It may serve an investor well to first study the monthly or quarterly reports of the UITF he is interested in. These are readily available in the websites of the particular trust entities. The NAVpUs of the UITFs are likewise available in www.uitf.com.ph.
Index Funds
A Fund category that will soon be launched is the Index Fund category. The funds that would fall under this classification could be equity funds or fixed-income funds. Essentially, these funds would aim to shadow the performance of existing equity or fixed-income indices. As such, their portfolios would attempt to mirror those that make up the chosen indices. For example, the Phisix is an index of the Philippine equity market. An investor whose objective is to have the same return as the Phisix may therefore invest in an Index Fund that is “indexed” to the Phisix. Proponents of Index Funds point out the following advantages: a) Index Funds generally have lower management expenses compared to other types of funds and b) Index Funds have better returns as majority of actively managed funds fail to beat broad indices in the long run.
Source: http://www.uitf.com.ph/

0 Responses to “UITF CLASSIFICATION”:
Post a Comment